Fundamental Propositions of Theosophy
The
following are some of the fundamental propositions of Theosophy put forth by HP
Blavatsky in the 19th Century:
The
spirit in man is the only real and permanent part of his being; the rest of his
nature being variously compounded. And since decay is incident to all composite
things, everything in man but his spirit is impermanent.
Further,
the universe being one thing and not diverse, and everything within it being
connected with the whole and with every other thing therein, of which upon the
upper plane (below referred to) there is a perfect knowledge, no act or thought
occurs without each portion of the great whole perceiving and noting it. Hence
all are inseparably bound together by the tie of Brotherhood.
This
first fundamental proposition of Theosophy postulates that the universe is not
an aggregation of diverse unities but that it is one whole. This whole is what
is denominated "Deity" by Western Philosophers, and "Para-Brahma" by the Hindu
Vedantins. It may be called the Unmanifested, containing within itself the
potency of every form of manifestation, together with the laws governing those
manifestations. Further, it is taught that there is no creation of worlds in
the theological sense; but that their appearance is due strictly to evolution.
When the time comes for the Unmanifested to manifest as an objective Universe,
which it does periodically, it emanates a Power or "The First Cause"
so called because it itself is the rootless root of that Cause, and called in
the East the "Causeless Cause."
The first Cause we may call Brahma,
or Ormazd, or Osiris, or by any name we please. The projection into time of the
influence or so-called "breath of Brahma" causes all the worlds and
the beings upon them to gradually appear. They remain in manifestation just as
long as that influence continues to proceed forth in evolution. After long
aeons the outbreathing, evolutionary influence slackens, and the universe
begins to go into obscuration, or Pralaya, until, the "breath" being
fully indrawn, no objects remain, because nothing is but Brahma. Care must be
taken by the student to make a distinction between Brahma (the impersonal ParaBrahma) and Brahma the manifested Logos. A discussion of the means used by
this power in acting would be out of place in this Epitome, but of those means
Theosophy also treats. (One can find those discussions by H. P. Blavatsky and
William Q Judge at: https://www.theosophytrust.org/.)
This
breathing-forth is known as a Manvantara,
described in Theosophy as the Manifestation of the world between two Manus (from Manu, and Antara
"between") and the completion of the inbreathing brings with it Pralaya, or destruction. It is from
these truths that the erroneous doctrines of "creation" and the
"last judgment" have sprung. Such Manvantaras
and Pralayas have eternally occurred,
and will continue to take place periodically and forever.
For
the purpose of a Manvantara two
so-called eternal principles are postulated, that is, Purusha and Prakriti (or
spirit and matter), because both are ever present and conjoined in each
manifestation. Those terms are used here because no equivalent for them exists
in English. Purusha is called
"spirit," and Prakriti
"matter," but this Purusha
is not the unmanifested, nor is Prakriti
matter as known to science; the Aryan Sages therefore declare that there is a
higher spirit still, called Purushottama.
The reason for this is that at the night of Brahma, or the so-called indrawing
of his breath, both Purusha and Prakriti are absorbed in the
Unmanifested; a conception which is the same as the idea underlying the
Biblical expression – "remaining in the bosom of the Father."
Additional
information and articles on Theosophy by HP Blavatsky, William Q Judge and
others may be found at the Theosophy Trust website at: https://www.theosophytrust.org/.
Comments
Post a Comment